 |


 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
It can be abused in so many ways.
Like when the Democrats keep funding their political campaigns with illegal contributions.
WASHINGTON (AP) - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's decision to return thousands of dollars from a top fundraiser wanted as a fugitive in California illustrates the perils of the pell-mell rush for political money - your friends can be your worst enemies.
Just ask Clinton and her rivals Barack Obama and John Edwards.
All three have experience putting out brushfires caused by former rainmakers.
Earlier this year, Clinton divested her political action committee, HillPac, of tainted contributions received from a Pakistani immigrant accused of plotting illegal donations. Obama donated to charity money he received in past campaigns from a Chicago developer caught in an Illinois corruption scandal. And just last week, the lawyer who represented assisted suicide advocate Jack Kevorkian was indicted on charges of conspiring to make more than $125,000 in illegal contributions to Edwards' 2004 presidential campaign. Wow, nice of the MSM to spin that as not the candidate's fault, even though (in the case of Mrs. Clinton) it follows an established pattern of abuse that goes back for decades.
Campaign finance reform? That's just to keep the "little people" from having their say.
Then there is pork spending of the worst kind: blackmailed and extorted from the taxpayers.
The flow of federal dollars to the Gulf Coast two years after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita devastated the region already exceeds what the U.S. spent on the Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe after World War II.
President Bush and Congress have committed more than $127 billion in resources and tax relief for the region — significantly more than inflation-adjusted $107.6 billion directed to 16 countries in Europe between 1947 and 1951. Of course objecting to this merely proves that you "hate black people".
Money isn't the problem with politics and it never has been. The problem with politics has been dirty politicians who abuse political fundraising and their fiduciary responsibility toward the taxpayers.
We don't need to get the money out of politics, we need to get the bad politicians out of politics.
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : democrats, hurricane katrina, political fundraising, politics, scandals Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
You knew it was going to happen. At least, you should have known. Once politicians get into the picture you can be sure something will be screwed up.
TUSCALOOSA, Ala. (AP) - With large swaths of the Gulf Coast still in ruins from Hurricane Katrina, rich federal tax breaks designed to spur rebuilding are flowing hundreds of miles inland to investors who are buying up luxury condos near the University of Alabama's football stadium.
About 10 condominium projects are going up in and around Tuscaloosa, and builders are asking up to $1 million for units with granite countertops, king-size bathtubs and 'Bama decor, including crimson couches and Bear Bryant wall art. How is it that the same people who enabled this clusterfuck are allegedly able to transform the currently bureaucratically crippled system into a wonder of the free world? By using more bureaucracy?
That is simply not logical.
Only deniers would disagree with me. Just ask Newsweek!
 Current Mood : amused  Tags : bureaucracy, federal spending, hurricane katrina, politics Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
How long are politicians in Louisiana going to milk Katrina?
NEW ORLEANS (AP) - Gov. Kathleen Blanco angrily criticized President Bush on Wednesday for not mentioning 2005's destructive hurricanes in his State of the Union speech, and said Louisiana is being shortchanged in federal recovery funding for political reasons. Stop the whining! It is the state of the Union, not the state of Louisiana a year and a half ago. Current Mood : ammoyed  Tags : hurricane katrina, kathleen blanco, louisiana, new orleans Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
It is funny (in a sad way) that governments are so eager to pass laws against private sector "price gouging" while turning a blind eye towards price gouging in the public sector.
NEW ORLEANS (AP) - Government agencies paid inflated prices for goods and services in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in a system riddled with waste, three government inspectors general testified at a congressional hearing Monday. Why, I am so shocked to hear this.
U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., who chaired the hearing, cited the cost FEMA paid to install each mobile home: "In Oklahoma, we could build a nice little home for $70,000." A bureaucratic monolith not doing things as well as a profit-driven free market? Who'd a thunk it!
Wal Mart, please come back, all is forgiven! Current Mood : amused  Tags : bureaucracy, free markets, hurricane katrina Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
I expect some bended-knee groveling out there from my Democrat friends.
WASHINGTON (AP) - In the hectic, confused hours after Hurricane Katrina lashed the Gulf Coast, Louisiana's governor hesitantly but mistakenly assured the Bush administration that New Orleans' protective levees were intact, according to new video obtained by The Associated Press showing briefings that day with federal officials.
"We keep getting reports in some places that maybe water is coming over the levees," Gov. Kathleen Blanco said shortly after noon on Aug. 29, according to the video. "We heard a report unconfirmed, I think, we have not breached the levee. I think we have not breached the levee at this time." Democrats should stay away from sharp objects this year. Everything they try backfires in spectacular ways.
Note that the AP is still misrepresenting the earlier videos:
The AP separately obtained video earlier from other briefings before the hurricane made landfall. That video showed U.S. officials warning that Katrina might breach levees, put lives at risk in New Orleans' Superdome and overwhelm rescuers. Those videos shows people discussing levees being topped, not breached. In addition, the rest of this article repeats earlier claims that the President was at fault for "not reacting" to news of levee breaches despite this video which shows the President and governor Blanco did not have confirmation of levee breaches at this point.
Once again we see that the MSM and Democrats have systematically lied to the American people. Current Mood : cheerful  Tags : george w. bush, hurricane katrina, kathleen blanco, levees, new orleans
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
The left is once again digging up old news and trying to recast it as something scandalous.
President Bush, in one of the many briefings that took place about Katrina, was told that maybe, possibly, a levee might not be able to hold back the water.
Well, duh. That is indeed what people were worried about.
What the left would like to damn the President for is uttering words to the effect that no one expected the levees to fail.
What is missing from their tirades is context. The President was referring to the period when the storm had shifted away from New Orleans, and thus people reasoned that the city would be spared and the levees would be okay.
Obviously, however, the levees were not okay. The fact that they failed their designed load (a category 3 storm) is not the President's fault.
Nor is it a huge deal that he was expressing optimism around this time (another weird accusation from the left). The President is supposed to be inspiring people at this time, not wringing his hands and wailing "woe be our fate!" and pleading for help. (Blanco and Nagin had that covered very well!)
It is clear the left will simply take everything the President does and spin it in the most negative (and at times, absurd) way possible.
In the process they are crowding out discussions about legitimate issues, such as whether a bureaucracy can ever be flexible enough to cover any potential disaster.
Update: Video shows Blanco telling President Bush levees were safe.
"We keep getting reports in some places that maybe water is coming over the levees," Gov. Kathleen Blanco said shortly after noon on Aug. 29, according to the video. "We heard a report unconfirmed, I think, we have not breached the levee. I think we have not breached the levee at this time." Current Mood : working  Tags : george w. bush, hurricane katrina, msm
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
In a study by the government about the government the findings are: the problem is the government.
WASHINGTON (AP) - Government at all levels took only an indifferent stance toward disaster preparations after the 2001 terror attacks, leaving the Gulf Coast unnecessarily vulnerable to Hurricane Katrina, a House inquiry concludes.
Finding fault with the White House down to local officials, the House investigation determined that authorities failed to move quickly to protect people - even when faced with warnings days ahead of the storm last Aug. 29.
The final report, written by a Republican-dominated special House committee, was obtained The Associated Press on Tuesday night ahead of its scheduled release Wednesday. Parts of the report were released Sunday.
"Passivity did the most damage," concluded the 520-page report by the committee, chaired by Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., charged with investigating the sluggish response to Katrina. "The failure of initiative cost lives, prolonged suffering, and left all Americans justifiably concerned our government is no better prepared to protect its people than it was before 9/11, even if we are." This should not be a surprise to anyone. Government is not known for its initiative.
Something that is missing from this report (at least from the parts I have seen so far) is Congress admitting that it is part of the problem. Disaster preparedness and flood control have been in the hands of Congress for generations, yet New Orleans couldn't even survive a category 3 storm from which the levee system was supposed to protect it.
The government should make local officials more responsible for the efforts in their own areas. In Katrina there was a pronounced tendency for local officials to simply break down and wait for federal aid. There is nothing stopping local officials from coordinating local relief efforts with local companies and local branches of national companies to provide short-term relief. If companies like Wal Mart and Home Depot can get food, water and construction supplies to their stores there is no reason why local official cannot take advantage of that. You don't need a FEMA water truck if Wal Mart can bring in a semi load of bottled water. Current Mood : busy  Tags : bureaucracy, congress, government, hurricane katrina
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
One of the people who failed miserably the wake of hurricane Katrina has resigned.
NEW ORLEANS — After 26 years on the police force — capped by four weeks in which he was the public face of local law enforcement's erratic response to Hurricane Katrina — Eddie Compass resigned Tuesday as New Orleans' police superintendent. Could it have something to do with the massive instances of police officers deserting their posts, quitting and looting after hurricane Katrina and the revelation of padded payrolls?
I'm the ultimate warrior. I'm going to be the last person to leave the battlefield. —Eddie Compass
Here's some free advice, Mr. Compass: next time get your house in order before you run to Oprah.
Now if we can just get Mayor Nagin, Governor Blanco and a few parish presidents to follow suit.... Current Mood : busy  Tags : hurricane katrina, new orleans
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Local officials, who were supposed to be helping the people, were instead helping themselves to relief supplies!
BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Police found cases of food, clothes and tools intended for hurricane victims in the backyard, shed and rooms throughout the home of a chief administrative officer of a New Orleans suburb, officials said Wednesday. What a wonderful local government New Orleans enjoys! They should all be put on work details repairing the levees. Current Mood : disgusted  Tags : hurricane katrina, new orleans, scandals
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
The MSM is shocked over the positive reaction to President Bush's speech among the victims of hurricane Katrina.
ABC had lined people up outside the Houston Astrodome in the hopes of obtaining a juicy soundbite about how the people hated President Bush and blamed him for their lot.
Much to the dismay of ABC (and despite leading questions) the people expressed positive reviews of the President's words and blamed state and local officials for not using available transportation or following their own emergency plans.
LONDON: Yeah, I believe him because here in Texas they have truly been good to us.
REYNOLDS: Did you get a sense of hope that you could return to your home one day in New Orleans?
LONDON: Yes, I did. I did.
REYNOLDS: Did you harbor any anger toward the president because of the slow federal response?
LONDON: No. None whatsoever, because I feel like our city and our state government should have been there before the federal government was called in. They should have been on their jobs.
REYNOLDS: And they weren't?
LONDON: No. No, no, no. Lord, they wasn't. I mean, they had RTA buses, Greyhound buses, school buses, that was just sitting there going underwater when they could have been evacuating people.
Indeed, some even put some of the blame on themselves, noting that they had plenty of time to leave but chose not to.
MARY: I'm going to tell you the truth. I had the opportunity to get out, but I didn't believe it. So I stayed there ‘til it was too late. Now desperate, Nightline tried to get someone, anyone to blame President Bush for the floodgate failure, but the residents put the blame squarely where it belongs:
LONDON: It was not the hurricane itself. It was the floodgates. When they opened the floodgates, that's where all the water came.
REYNOLDS: Do you blame anybody for this?
LONDON: Oh, yes. I mean they've been allocating federal funds to fix the levee system, and it never got done. I fault the mayor of our city personally. I really do. The people know the truth!
Undeterred by this setback, the MSM plans on setting up shop in New Orleans in the hopes of providing 24/7 news critical of President Bush in the run-up to the 2006 elections. Current Mood : hopeful  Tags : george w. bush, hurricane katrina, msm
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Mike Brown tells of chaos in trying to deal with New Orleans and Louisiana officials; admits he made incorrect assumptions.
Mr. Brown, then director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, said he told the officials in Washington that the Louisiana governor, Kathleen Babineaux Blanco, and her staff were proving incapable of organizing a coherent state effort and that his field officers in the city were reporting an "out of control" situation. My earlier thoughts about Brown appear to be true. He is only as good as his compatriots. That is: good when he's dealing with Florida officials, not so good when dealing with Louisiana officials. Current Mood : working  Tags : fema, hurricane katrina, michael brown
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |


 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
MoltenThought has a few molten thoughts for the critics of the relief effort in the MSM:
As a former Air Force logistics officer, let me clarify the following for the idiots in the Left Wing Media:
1. Things can get destroyed far more swiftly than they can get fixed. 2. The United States military can wipe out the Taliban and the Iraqi Republican Guard far more swiftly than they can bring 3 million Swanson dinners to an underwater city through an area the size of Great Britain which has no power, no working ports or airports, and a devastated and impassable road network. 3. You cannot speed recovery and relief efforts up by prepositioning assets since the assets are endangered by the very storm which destroyed the region. 4. We do not yet have teleporter nor replicator technology like you saw on "Star Trek" in college between hookah hits and waiting to pick up your worthless communications degree while the grownups actually engaged in the recovery effort today were studying engineering. 5. Getting people out of the stricken areas is the most pressing concern, since we cannot get enough supplies into it to safely sustain them. 6. Getting the airport, bridges, and roads repaired is the next priority, since the supplies and people needed to fix levees, drain the city, and repair the infrastructure cannot be transported via aircraft. You need to truck them in. 7. Once the infrastructure is repaired, it is vital to get the ports in working order. Equipment and supplies can only be moved into the area in large quantities by sea. 8. Only then can recovery efforts begin in earnest. 9. The above will take weeks and months, not days or hours. 10. No amount of yelling, crying, and mustering of moral indignation will change any of the facts above. Facts are facts. Opinion is cheap. 11. You could do more help actually keeping your damned satellite trucks out of the way of the folks doing the real work. 12. If you must vent your indignation, how about targeting the Louisiana officials who did absolutely nothing to protect their constituents? At least you can help ensure the populace doesn't elect these clowns again. I love the smell of napalm in the morning.
It is easy for members of the media to think that if they got to [location X] why can't anyone else? They forget that moving a column of people, supplies and support equipment takes time and requires suitable ground paths, unlike a MSM "road warrior" who gets airlifted in via the corporate helicopter. Current Mood : determined  Tags : hurricane katrina
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Blacks fault local leaders for their lack of leadership:
"Mayor Nagin has blamed everyone else except himself," said the Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, founder and president of the Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny.
"The mayor failed in his duty to evacuate and protect the people of New Orleans. ... The truth is, black people died not because of President Bush or racism, they died because of their unhealthy dependence on the government and the incompetence of Mayor Ray Nagin and Governor Kathleen Blanco," he said. The truth is leaking out despite the MSM levees!
Hat tip to hollie_is_right! Current Mood : satisfied  Tags : hurricane katrina, kathleen blanco, louisiana, new orleans, ray nagin
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Anyone who looked into the truth of the funding levels for the Corps of Engineers should have known that the problem was not a lack of funding.
In today's Washington Post is yet more proof that that is the case:
Before Hurricane Katrina breached a levee on the New Orleans Industrial Canal, the Army Corps of Engineers had already launched a $748 million construction project at that very location. But the project had nothing to do with flood control. The Corps was building a huge new lock for the canal, an effort to accommodate steadily increasing barge traffic.
Except that barge traffic on the canal has been steadily decreasing.
In Katrina's wake, Louisiana politicians and other critics have complained about paltry funding for the Army Corps in general and Louisiana projects in particular. But over the five years of President Bush's administration, Louisiana has received far more money for Corps civil works projects than any other state, about $1.9 billion; California was a distant second with less than $1.4 billion, even though its population is more than seven times as large. A lack of Federal funding is hardly ever the reason when the government spends two trillion dollars of your money.
I expect that the usual suspects (the MSM) will refuse to admit their partisan (and unsupported) allegations of funding cuts in the wake of the hurricane were wrong. The facts never mattered to them, they were just trying to score political points on the backs of the dead and the dying and the suffering.
I noted that there was a difference between spending money for flood control and spending money for construction, yet the left continued to parade their hearsay stories about alleged (and mythical) funding cuts despite the evidence that tens of millions were being spent each year on flood control. I challenged them to come up with a list of projects that were canceled, only to be met with silence. I noted that any projects that were cancelled would have been due to the Bush administration policy of demanding a positive payback for each project instead of simply being wasteful pork spending that accomplished nothing.
Much of that Louisiana money was spent to try to keep low-lying New Orleans dry. But hundreds of millions of dollars have gone to unrelated water projects demanded by the state's congressional delegation and approved by the Corps, often after economic analyses that turned out to be inaccurate. Indeed, some of the most vocal critics on the Bush administration have had a hand in the pork spending:
Despite a series of independent investigations criticizing Army Corps construction projects as wasteful pork-barrel spending, Louisiana's representatives have kept bringing home the bacon.
For example, after a $194 million deepening project for the Port of Iberia flunked a Corps cost-benefit analysis, Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) tucked language into an emergency Iraq spending bill ordering the agency to redo its calculations. The Corps also spends tens of millions of dollars a year dredging little-used waterways such as the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, the Atchafalaya River and the Red River -- now known as the J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, in honor of the project's congressional godfather -- for barge traffic that is less than forecast. This wasteful spending goes back to the Clinton administration, and was one of the things President Bush pledged to stop by requiring cost-benefit analysis for each project before they would be funded. However, the politicians and bureaucrats (the same ones pleading poverty on their Corps websites) found ways around that.
The Industrial Canal lock is one of the agency's most controversial projects, sued by residents of a New Orleans low-income black neighborhood and cited by an alliance of environmentalists and taxpayer advocates as the fifth-worst current Corps boondoggle. In 1998, the Corps justified its plan to build a new lock -- rather than fix the old lock for a tiny fraction of the cost -- by predicting huge increases in use by barges traveling between the Port of New Orleans and the Mississippi River.
In fact, barge traffic on the canal had been plummeting since 1994, but the Corps left that data out of its study. And barges have continued to avoid the canal since the study was finished, even though they are visiting the port in increased numbers. To pile insult on top of injury, it was the above pork barrel project that failed on August 30th:
Pam Dashiell, president of the Holy Cross Neighborhood Association, remembers holding a protest against the lock four years ago -- right where the levee broke Aug. 30. Now she's holed up with her family in a St. Louis hotel, and her neighborhood is underwater. "Our politicians never cared half as much about protecting us as they cared about pork," Dashiell said.
Yesterday, congressional defenders of the Corps said they hoped the fallout from Hurricane Katrina would pave the way for billions of dollars of additional spending on water projects. Steve Ellis, a Corps critic with Taxpayers for Common Sense, called their push "the legislative equivalent of looting." Nor can the efforts by the Bush administration to make the Corps projects cost effective be blamed:
But overall, the Bush administration's funding requests for the key New Orleans flood-control projects for the past five years were slightly higher than the Clinton administration's for its past five years. Lt. Gen. Carl Strock, the chief of the Corps, has said that in any event, more money would not have prevented the drowning of the city, since its levees were designed to protect against a Category 3 storm, and the levees that failed were already completed projects. Strock has also said that the marsh-restoration project would not have done much to diminish Katrina's storm surge, which passed east of the coastal wetlands. Like a teenager whining for an increase from $2 a week to $10 and getting $5, the Corps bureaucrats and their political accomplices claimed "cuts" when in reality they were getting more money each year.
"The project manager for the Great Pyramids probably put in a request for 100 million shekels and only got 50 million," said John Paul Woodley Jr., the Bush administration official overseeing the Corps. "Flood protection is always a work in progress; on any given day, if you ask whether any community has all the protection it needs, the answer is almost always: Maybe, but maybe not." Of course, the answer is "not" when the politicians come looking for your tax dollars.
Louisiana not only leads the nation in overall Corps funding, it places second in new construction -- just behind Florida, home of an $8 billion project to restore the Everglades. If one must find a political process to reform, look no further than Congress itself. Despite constantly spending millions they always asked for more without ever spending the money on key projects such as maintenance.
Overall, Army Corps funding has remained relatively constant for decades, despite the "Program Growth Initiative" launched by agency generals in 1999 without telling their civilian bosses in the Clinton administration. The Bush administration has proposed cuts in the Corps budget, and has tried to shift the agency's emphasis from new construction to overdue maintenance. But most of those proposals have died quietly on Capitol Hill, and the administration has not fought too hard to revive them. If the voters of Louisiana are angry, I suggest a thorough political house cleaning, starting with the mayor of New Orleans and going all the way up to the governor and Senators. Current Mood : vindicated  Tags : bush administration, federal spending, hurricane katrina, louisiana, msm, new orleans
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Ray Nagin refuses to answer questions yet continues to demand answers from others:
Nagin also remained defiant, rebuffing recent criticism from federal authorities and media representatives who have tried to shift the blame for the slow response for support to the local and state levels.
"I welcome that," he said. "I welcome the criticism. My question to them is, 'Where were you? Where the hell were you?'" I'll tell you where I wasn't, Mr. Mayor: I was not having a nervous breakdown on national TV. New Orleans was a disaster area in every sense of the word until the military finally arrived to save your ass. I suggest you spend more time coming up with answers to questions like why didn't you use public school buses to get your citizens out and why you didn't properly provision, staff and provide protection for the evacuation centers.
Mayor Nagin can't claim ignorance, either:
A year ago, as Hurricane Ivan approached, New Orleans ordered an evacuation but did not use city or school buses to help people evacuate. As a result many of the poorest citizens were unable to evacuate. Fortunately, the hurricane changed course and did not hit New Orleans, but both Gov. Blanco and Mayor Nagin acknowledged the need for a better evacuation plan. Again, they did not take corrective actions. In 1998, during a threat by Hurricane George, 14,000 people were sent to the Superdome and theft and vandalism were rampant due to inadequate security. Again, these problems were not corrected.
That was your job. Where the hell were you, Mr. Mayor? Where the hell have you been? Current Mood : determined  Tags : hurricane katrina, new orleans, ray nagin
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
An article in Newsweek details the decades of neglect on the local level for the levees in New Orleans. As I noted in previous posts, the locals seemed to be doing everything except actually preparing for the next hurricane.
You get my point. The levee board appears to be doing everything but devoting its time to the maintenance of the levees in recent years—and the city is now paying the price. Not too surprisingly, the left is trying to portray local leaders preventing the Red Cross from entering New Orleans as a plot by the Evil Overlord...um, I mean President Bush to kill people who are poor and/or black. From the Red Cross web site:
The state Homeland Security Department had requested--and continues to request--that the American Red Cross not come back into New Orleans following the hurricane. Apparently the left thinks no one will notice the word "state" before the words "Homeland Security". Current Mood : busy  Tags : hurricane katrina, louisiana, new orleans, red cross
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
The nightmare for New Orleans should be ending now that the Federal government has taken over the city.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said Sunday the federal government is in control of hurricane-ravaged New Orleans after days in which authorities failed to reach stranded refugees and evacuate the city. Finally some good news for New Orleans.
Update: Behind the scenes Feds struggle to wrest control away from incompetent local governments.
Behind the scenes, a power struggle emerged, as federal officials tried to wrest authority from Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco (D). Shortly before midnight Friday, the Bush administration sent her a proposed legal memorandum asking her to request a federal takeover of the evacuation of New Orleans, a source within the state's emergency operations center said Saturday. Of course, the local governments resisted the effort can complained that it was a blame game.
The administration sought unified control over all local police and state National Guard units reporting to the governor. Louisiana officials rejected the request after talks throughout the night, concerned that such a move would be comparable to a federal declaration of martial law. Some officials in the state suspected a political motive behind the request. "Quite frankly, if they'd been able to pull off taking it away from the locals, they then could have blamed everything on the locals," said the source, who does not have the authority to speak publicly. Nice move, Governor Blanco! Play politics while people die. Current Mood : hopeful  Tags : hurricane katrina, new orleans
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
What the hell is going on in your city, Mayor Nagin?
Why don't you have control over your own police force? There have been reports that they have engaged in looting, that they have abandoned their posts and now they are shooting people who are trying to repair things!
Police shot eight people carrying guns on a New Orleans bridge Sunday, killing five or six, a deputy chief said. A spokesman for the Army Corps of Engineers said the victims were contractors on their way to repair a canal.
It is obvious that you lost control of your city a week ago and still have not regained control over it. It is time for the Federal government to impose martial law and take over the area.
Update: Another report out says that the police shot and killed people shooting at the contractors. Ah, I love the MSM. That would be good news, though. Current Mood : dismayed  Tags : hurricane katrina, new orleans
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
It doesn't happen often, but every once in a while the people at FactCheck drop the ball.
In the case of whether President Bush "cut" funding to the Army Corps of Engineers they've fallen victim to the old Washington ploy of describing an increase in funding that falls short of the moon as "a cut".
For example, if the Corps was funded at $300 million and asked for $500 million the next year and President Bush (and Congress, of course) eventually settle on $400 million the Corps may term that a "cut" of $100 million, as they have done here. As an aside I'll note that Mr. Hull publicly whining about taxpayers not "fully funding" all of his organizations projects is a disgrace. He works for us, not the other way around!
As I posted previously, funding for the Army Corps of Engineers has increased every year that President Bush has submitted a budget. That makes project funding a matter of prioritization within the Corps. Indeed, as the President stated early on that projects that did not meet a certain return on investment would be delayed or canceled.
Reduces the backlog of ongoing construction projects and completes those projects in the budget sooner than possible under current spending trends, primarily by not starting new projects—the budget completes 30 projects in 2003, or 15 percent of the projects in the budget. Part of the rational was "mission creep":
In recent years, the Congress has authorized and appropriated funds for the Corps to undertake an increasing number of projects that fall outside the scope of its historic missions, such as building sewage treatment plants, revitalizing local waterfronts, and maintaining waterways primarily for local recreation. Whatever the merit of these projects, they should be carried out by others. It was up to the Corps to demonstrate the value and appropriateness of each ongoing and planned project. I am not surprised they claim that if they were given tens of millions of more taxpayer dollars they could do more "projects". I could do a lot with that money, too! Say...that gives me an idea: OMG, PRESIDENT BUSH HAS SLASHED MY BUDGET BY $20 MILLION! I demand more taxpayer money! *cough*
However, even with more money projects would not be finished because more and more projects were be added without first waiting for existing projects to be completed:
Unfortunately, as the accompanying chart shows, this backlog of ongoing construction projects has increased in recent years, as the Congress has added funds to start more new projects than can be afforded. The 2003 Budget proposes to reverse this trend. With the result that the Corps was spending enormous amounts of money just to keep projects "on hold" once they had been started, yet not making substantial progress towards their completion. The Corps was becoming paralyzed because of an overload of projects.
As Mr. Hull admits in his oh-so-poor-are-we website:
Closure of the last two gaps should be completed by September 2005. Overall project completion is scheduled for 2015. In other words, sufficient funding was provided to finish the project this year, as the corps announced. The rest of the project is a long-term project not scheduled for completion until 2015. Obviously throwing more money at it at this stage was not going to get it finished any time soon.
In addition, many of the figures cited are for construction and not flood control. Construction is a far larger scope than dedicated flood control. It is possible to "cut" (again, overall funding increased!) construction funding and not touch actual flood control projects. More than a single "fact sheet" from one person at the Corps is required to determine how Corps projects were being funded over the years. All available evidence points to increased overall funding!
FactCheck cites Mr. Hull (is he speaking for the Army Corps of Engineers in an official capacity?) stating that "several" projects are not being funded as evidence of "funding cuts". As I noted above, President Bush demands that a real (positive) return on investment be demonstrated for projects before they would be funded. If these "several" projects didn't meet that requirement it is no wonder they were not funded in FY2005!
FactCheck cites various publications as demonstrating "cuts" (such as 44%) yet can provide no source documentation to support these allegations. Once again I suspect the claims of "cuts" are simply cases of increases in funding not matching pie in the sky requests for funding. Again, overall Corps funding increased from 2001 through 2005. If (IF) projects were cut in the New Orleans area it was a result of prioritization within the Corps and or the inability of the Corps to demonstrate a meaningful return on investment for those projects! This policy resulted in more projects being completed than under the old procedure since ineffective projects were dropped, freeing up resources for more valuable projects. Thus the ineffective projects had to be "cut"!
As the record shows, overall funding for flood control (total, not just New Orleans) has been around $320 million per year since FY2000, with additional funds provided after emergencies. Overall funding for the entire Corps has increased from $4.1 billion in FY2000 to more then $5 billion in FY2005. Any problems in the system are not due to a lack of funding! Current Mood : accomplished  Tags : factcheck.org, federal spending, hurricane katrina
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |



|
 |
|
 |