 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
I didn't realize my request was going to be granted so quickly!
Modeled after the popular Cash for Clunkers program, which was intended to get cars with low gas mileage off the road, a federal appliance rebate program is launching in early 2010. It offers a boost to people buying energy-efficient clothes washers, refrigerators and other appliances — those that qualify for the federal "Energy Star" designation — and to manufacturers, whose sales fell 10 percent in 2008 and another 12 percent through mid-December this year. Wooo, time to go shopping for new appliances and heating/air conditioning!
Thanks, suckers!
 Current Mood : bonus!  Tags : federal spending, obama administration, scandals
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Then rubs your face in it by pretending that (kind of) saving $40 billion versus the $12 trillion (of your money) that he has spent and plans on spending demonstrates an end to "monopoly money" government.
 Current Mood : cynical  Tags : federal spending, obama administration
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Let's say you get in your time machine and spin back to 2008. You convince politicians to invest $3 trillion instead of simply blowing it on bailouts and stimulus schemes.
Some samples of what could have been (or might be, depending on where you are in your time machine):
- $3 trillion invested in Apple stock at an average price of $80 a share yields 37.5 billion shares of Apple stock. Now ignoring the affect of buying (and selling) that much stuck, you could then sell it today at say an average price of $200 a share and return $7.5 trillion to the taxpayers and/or pay off an additional $4.5 trillion in debt.
- $3 trillion invested in gold at $75 an ounce yields 45 billion ounces of gold. Again ignoring the market distortions from buying/selling that much gold, selling it today at $105 an ounce yields $4.2 trillion.
- $3 trillion invested in a Dow Jones index fund would garner a 25% gain, or an additional $750 billion.
What he have instead are $3 trillion mostly wasted; either used to prop up companies that should have been allowed to go bankrupt or cycled through the Washington bureaucracy and then used to bribe voters into thinking money had been "spent" in their area "creating or saving" jobs.
This is one of the reasons they don't teach math or logic in many union-controlled schools. You can't bribe people with their own money if they know math and logic!
Now for all you people who think the "stimulus" was a great idea: please send me all of your money. I promise to travel right to your very neighborhood to spend most some of it! Think of all the jobs you'll create or save in the process!
Suckers.
 Current Mood : The joke's on you!  Tags : federal spending, obama administration, scandals Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Have you heard the one about where a President uses money borrowed under a previous administration in an attempt to make is own outrageous deficits appear smaller?
Sadly, it's no joke. The Obama administration is proposing that money borrowed under TARP (during 2008) be used to "pay down the deficit" in the 2010 fiscal year. Remember when politicians told us we'd have another Great Depression if we didn't allocate this money immediately to save the financial markets? And here more than a year later it remains unused, along with most of a second round of even more massive "emergency" spending. (See the trend?)
If the Obama administration succeeds it will be a new low in corrupting democracy. In the future Democrats will simply borrow huge amounts of money at the end of Republican terms and then "reallocate" that money to pay down debts in a succeeding term of a Democrat. This makes the Republican spending look higher that it is and the Democrat spending lower than it is.
Talk about robbing George to pay Barrack! Unused TARP money should remain unused, as in unborrowed, as in the President rescinding the funds. With reports that anywhere from $400-600 billion was used from TARP funding that would make the 2008 deficit almost $200 billion lower. What Obama hopes to do, of course, is make his own outrageous deficits look $200 billion smaller.
Note to Democrats who parrot talking points: this is vastly different than Senator Brownback's proposal to pay down the federal debt with money repaid by firms that borrowed it. If you don't understand why you shouldn't be attempting to argue other people's talking points.
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : bush administration, federal spending, obama administration, scandals Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |


 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
When it comes to credibility the Obama administration is seriously lacking when it comes to the economy.
After a series of vacillating (and contradictory) statements on what his policies have and haven't done for the economy even the administration's paltry job creation numbers have proven to be as ethereal as Obama's plans for the Middle East.
The government's first accounting of jobs tied to the $787 billion stimulus program claimed more than 30,000 positions paid for with recovery money. But that figure is overstated by least 5,000 jobs, according to an Associated Press review of a sample of stimulus contracts.
The AP review found some counts were more than 10 times as high as the actual number of jobs; some jobs credited to the stimulus program were counted two and sometimes more than four times; and other jobs were credited to stimulus spending when none was produced. Of course I've been saying all along that the administration is just making up numbers. That's what they have to do because nothing in the stimulus bills can be verified as a job creation process. Like a lot of liberals the administration believes its own talking points about people being unable to create jobs on their own and only government spending and policies enable job creation.
Painfully for America the administration will be slow to give up such notions. It's too bad that tax cuts are considered "Republican" ideas because that is exactly what is needed right now. And it wouldn't take $3 trillion worth of tax cuts to stimulate the economy, either.
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : economy, federal spending, jobs, obama administration, tax cuts Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
No one (outside of the MSM) believes the Obama administration stories that the end of the recession is "just around the corner".
In fact, the conflicting messages coming out of Washington over spending, what to "stimulate", whether jobs are being created (or "saved") and a continued backing of growth-killing tax hikes is demonstrating to the world that the administration doesn't know which way is up.
So unprecedented spending plus a lack of confidence in the administration's ability to do anything (effective) when it comes to the economy adds up to a plunging dollar.
But you have to expect that to happens when you elect people (like those in the Obama administration) who think a crisis in a way to get what you want by scaring people into going along with your ideas. Extending the crisis through policy decisions becomes attractive to those kinds of people!
I can't wait for the next two years. We will keep hearing that the "stimulus" has already worked and thus we should be happy we spent all that money but also that things are worse than anyone knew and its Bush's fault that that we're in this mess so Obama can't be blamed for wanting higher taxes.
Welcome to "change"! It is what you had hoped for? Nobody knew that what Obama really meant was that the dollar would only be worth "change" after he was elected!
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : economic policy, economy, federal spending, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Because Obama's first one is a whopper.
WASHINGTON – What is $1.42 trillion? It's more than the total national debt for the first 200 years of the Republic, more than the entire economy of India, almost as much as Canada's, and more than $4,700 for every man, woman and child in the United States.
It's the federal budget deficit for 2009, more than three times the most red ink ever amassed in a single year. You read that correctly.
Obama tripled the deficit his first year in office. So where is all the concern about budget deficits three times higher than the highest deficit under Bush...you know, back when deficits were allegedly a sign that the universe was ending?
I keep listening but all I hear are the sounds of crickets.
 Current Mood : vindicated  Tags : federal budget, federal deficit, federal spending, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |


 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Barack Obama is finding himself painted into a corner on higher taxes for the "middle class". He'll soon be using the same euphemisms the Clinton administration used to try and get around a pledge not to increase taxes on the middle class. Terms like "revenue enhancements", "user fees", "surcharges", etc will be bandied about but the grim truth is that spending is so out of control under the Obama administration that even the illusionary Social Security "surplus" is gone.
They'll try to hide at least until after the 2010 election cycle but the reality is your taxes are going to increase 10-20% by the end of Obama's first term. And that's if nothing is passed for health care "reform" or "cap and trade" carbon taxes. If those issues move forward you can look for even higher taxes.
We told you so!
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : federal spending, obama administration, taxes Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |


 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Yes, you read that right. Vice President Joe Biden is claiming that the stimulus has created a whopping 140,000 jobs and is doing more "than we hoped".
Talk about being out of touch with reality! Biden did not explain how the stimulus was doing more even though the economy is much worse than the Obama administration had predicted it would be if the stimulus bill passed.
Even more disconnected is the brewing claim from the Obama administration that passing a multi-trillion dollar health care spending bill will improve the economy (or that not passing it will make the economy worse).
And we're still waiting for liberal economists to explain why a debt situation at least twice as bad as that during the Bush years (even after adjusting for inflation) is not a problem while the debt situation during the Bush years was labeled a calamity by those same economists.
The American people know snake oil when they see it! The Obamanation spend-all cure-all proposal is being seen for what it really is: a sub-prime offering that will bankrupt the country.
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : economy, federal spending, hypocrisy, joe biden Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
More evidence that the Obama administration and Democrat controlled Congress are trying to spend unsustainable amounts of money.
You can tell the left knows this by the bad lies they tell about it.
And if you needed any more evidence there are always shockingly smart people telling you the same thing or that it's even worse:
As in $14 trillion instead of $9 trillion.
The left always relies on you, the overburdened taxpayer, to bail them out of fiscal trouble. So what happens to the nation when they spend so much money even taxing you, your children and your children's children isn't enough?
I suppose there are worse things than being foreclosed on by China, Canada, Russia, Great Britain, et al. Do you think they'll give us some consideration for all those forgiven loans from the WWII era?
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : economy, federal budget, federal deficit, federal spending, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
An article in the New York Post by Geoff Earle:
WASHINGTON - The stimulus package is living up to its provocative name by funding a bacchanalia of behavioral sex research, a Post analysis reveals.
The next fiscal year is set to be one of the friskiest ever in the nation's science labs, as researchers probe the ins and outs of sex patterns among humans and even some of our four-legged friends.
Among the most titillating grants awarded by the National Institutes of Health are studies that would:
* Examine "barriers to correct condom use" at Indiana University, at a cost of $221,000.
* Study "hookups" among adolescents at Syracuse University. Study's cost: $219,000.
* Evaluate "drug use as a sex enhancer" in an analysis of "high-risk community sex networks" at the University of Illinois, Chicago. That study will cost $123,000.
* Study how methamphetamine, thought to produce an "insatiable need" for sex among users, "enhances the motivation for female rat sexual behavior." Some $28,000 has been awarded for the University of Maryland at Baltimore study. I wonder if they'll coordinate this with the people in prison who received stimulus checks?
I'm sure they have a lot of that "insatiable need" for sex, too!
Those of you at home shouldn't let criminals and rats have all the fun! Find ways to waste the stimulus money, too! The sooner Congress runs out of money the sooner they stop wasting it!
 Current Mood : cynical  Tags : congress, democrats, federal spending, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
John Stossel has another excellent post about the evils of broken windows.
One of the points not stated is that certain politicians love "fixing broken windows" because they can attempt to claim credit for the spending! In an economy where money wasn't being funneled to the latest example of (allegedly) broken windows politicians would not be able to claim they were the ones who "fixed" the broken window!
Just another reason to sink these sorry attempts to buy votes by overwhelming them as soon as they are proposed! Politicians hope that enough people will eschew such programs and keep working like good "little people" so that the can funnel the money to buy the votes of the easily deceived. The best way to ruin that is to jump right in and forcefully demonstrate the "tragedy of the commons" as soon as possible.
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : democrats, federal spending, socialism Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
As schools reopen around the country I wonder if the students will be apprised of the fact that all that stimulus money being spent out there is going to have to be repaid with their future tax dollars.
With the dearth of economics classes and collectivist bent to most "social studies" classes in public schools I'm thinking not.
 Current Mood : cynical  Tags : economics, education, federal spending Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Obama is finally admitting that his spending dwarfs all other Presidents...combined.
The nation would be forced to borrow more than $9 trillion over the next decade under President Obama's policies, the White House acknowledged late Friday, bringing their long-term budget forecast in line with independent estimates.
—Greg Mankiw, via gregmankiw in this entry. The current federal debt stands at a "mere" $7.4 trillion right now. Remember how liberals thought it was a world-ending problem when the past few administrations averaged $1 trillion in debt per four-year term? Yet somehow Obama quadrupling the rate of deficit spending is not only fine, it is of no concern whatsoever.
Heck, some of those Cassandras are even claiming that Obama's level of spending is too low!
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : federal budget, federal deficit, federal spending, hypocrisy, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Except...it reveals a lot more about government run programs than he would probably like.
Obama and LaHood pledged that dealers will get their money back. But government data shows that many claims are still outstanding. As of Thursday, 457,000 sales worth $1.9 billion had been received. About 40 percent of those claims have been reviewed, but only $140 million, or about 7 percent of the claims dealers submitted, have actually been paid. If his government has this much trouble administering a relatively straightforward program such as "cash for clunkers" how well can it do with a program as complex as the proposed health care "reforms"?
Oh, the program ends on Monday, so be sure to go out and get your children's money's worth! If the government is going to waste your (children's) tax dollars you might as well get a little benefit (and help bring down the system, hopefully!). Tacitly admitting that this program can't go on forever is a start, at least.
Let's see...that's free houses and free cars...what else can we demand from the government to force it into admitting there is no free lunch after all? (Aside from end of life health care!)
 Current Mood : pleased  Tags : federal deficit, federal spending, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
A couple of months ago, when the recession kept going from bad to worse the Obama administration and its useful fools all repeated the same talking points: the stimulus wasn't supposed to deliver a recovery until next year, so you can't blame Democrats!
Then, this month, when things seem to be getting better those same people declared the stimulus to be a proven savior of the economy.
Except that there's no evidence to support either position! Remember, the first position was allegedly backed up by numbers showing that little of the stimulus money had actually been spent. (This, of course, was part of the plan. Get approval for trillions in spending, then spend it any way you wish as the situation changes.)
Now that numbers are a little better (we're still worse off than we were at any time since the Great Depression in some ways) it is precisely that tiny amount of spending that is allegedly the reason why things are (perhaps) getting better.
So...which one is it, guys? Recall that Paul Krugman (I know, I know) kept crying that the stimulus was "too small" because the government should be sucking up twice the amount of taxes they currently are, so keep spending until taxes that high are necessary to pay it off. Oh, and jobs will magically be created along the way. But now that a mere $70 billion has been spent and "credited" with "saving or creating" a million jobs (I know, I know) it appears that Krugman levels of spending are not necessary.
The answer is of course: it's both ways! Huge levels of spending by the government are both necessary and reasonable and will take a lot of time to work into the economy—but any improvement along the way is entirely a result of all of this planned spending. You would be silly to suggest otherwise!
In the mean time, don't let the lack of data or even a consistent economy theory get you down. Like global warming, this is an issue you should just have faith in. You know, like health care!
 Current Mood : amused  Tags : democrats, economy, federal spending, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |



|
 |
|
 |