 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Because Obama's first one is a whopper.
WASHINGTON – What is $1.42 trillion? It's more than the total national debt for the first 200 years of the Republic, more than the entire economy of India, almost as much as Canada's, and more than $4,700 for every man, woman and child in the United States.
It's the federal budget deficit for 2009, more than three times the most red ink ever amassed in a single year. You read that correctly.
Obama tripled the deficit his first year in office. So where is all the concern about budget deficits three times higher than the highest deficit under Bush...you know, back when deficits were allegedly a sign that the universe was ending?
I keep listening but all I hear are the sounds of crickets.
 Current Mood : vindicated  Tags : federal budget, federal deficit, federal spending, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
More evidence that the Obama administration and Democrat controlled Congress are trying to spend unsustainable amounts of money.
You can tell the left knows this by the bad lies they tell about it.
And if you needed any more evidence there are always shockingly smart people telling you the same thing or that it's even worse:
As in $14 trillion instead of $9 trillion.
The left always relies on you, the overburdened taxpayer, to bail them out of fiscal trouble. So what happens to the nation when they spend so much money even taxing you, your children and your children's children isn't enough?
I suppose there are worse things than being foreclosed on by China, Canada, Russia, Great Britain, et al. Do you think they'll give us some consideration for all those forgiven loans from the WWII era?
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : economy, federal budget, federal deficit, federal spending, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Obama is finally admitting that his spending dwarfs all other Presidents...combined.
The nation would be forced to borrow more than $9 trillion over the next decade under President Obama's policies, the White House acknowledged late Friday, bringing their long-term budget forecast in line with independent estimates.
—Greg Mankiw, via gregmankiw in this entry. The current federal debt stands at a "mere" $7.4 trillion right now. Remember how liberals thought it was a world-ending problem when the past few administrations averaged $1 trillion in debt per four-year term? Yet somehow Obama quadrupling the rate of deficit spending is not only fine, it is of no concern whatsoever.
Heck, some of those Cassandras are even claiming that Obama's level of spending is too low!
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : federal budget, federal deficit, federal spending, hypocrisy, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Except...it reveals a lot more about government run programs than he would probably like.
Obama and LaHood pledged that dealers will get their money back. But government data shows that many claims are still outstanding. As of Thursday, 457,000 sales worth $1.9 billion had been received. About 40 percent of those claims have been reviewed, but only $140 million, or about 7 percent of the claims dealers submitted, have actually been paid. If his government has this much trouble administering a relatively straightforward program such as "cash for clunkers" how well can it do with a program as complex as the proposed health care "reforms"?
Oh, the program ends on Monday, so be sure to go out and get your children's money's worth! If the government is going to waste your (children's) tax dollars you might as well get a little benefit (and help bring down the system, hopefully!). Tacitly admitting that this program can't go on forever is a start, at least.
Let's see...that's free houses and free cars...what else can we demand from the government to force it into admitting there is no free lunch after all? (Aside from end of life health care!)
 Current Mood : pleased  Tags : federal deficit, federal spending, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
I can't decide which is more pathetic: Obama's determination to triple the deficit or his stance that Bush made him do it.
Then again, neither measures up to the level of pathetic that is the MSM in their failure to note that Obama and the Democrats all voted for all this spending this year, after Bush left office.
Speaking of the MSM, where are the headlines about out of control violence in Iraq and the rising death toll in Afghanistan?
 Current Mood : Living in reality  Tags : federal deficit, hypocrisy, lies, msm, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Here comes the taxing!
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama's treasury secretary said Sunday he cannot rule out higher taxes to help tame an exploding budget deficit, and his chief economic adviser would not dismiss raising them on middle-class Americans as part of a health care overhaul. Suckers!
Gosh, no mention of the fact that Obama and the Democrats chose to "explode the deficit".
 Current Mood : vindicated  Tags : federal deficit, obama administration, taxes Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
I hope you aren't eating right now but (courtesy of scrivener_feed) the left seems to think "feed the beauty" is a nice little aphorism for spending trillions of dollars we don't have.
The fact that Democrats still refuse to acknowledge is that deficits are a result of higher spending, not tax cuts. Tax cuts can and do lead to economic expansions (or expansions larger and longer that we would have otherwise experienced) which greatly increases revenues over the long term. That's why the federal deficit was only 2.8% in 1989 (versus 2.6% in 1981) and about 1.2% in 2007 (versus an estimated 12-14% for this year).
There is, of course, no similar track record for massive increases in spending generating higher revenues down the road. That's why our children, once they obtain political power, should simply default on every penny of debt generated by the Obamanation. Let people like George Soros pay back that debt!
Here's a nice little chart to remind you why tax cuts are better than massive increases in spending:

What would you rather have, a deficit of 1.2% or 14%? Tax cuts are a major reason why we've had an expanding economy since the early 1980s. Now that we find ourselves in a major recession we should be cutting taxes again, not making things worse.
President Obama needs to reverse course before it is too late, rescind his perilous spending and cut payroll taxes by $1 trillion. The American economy would be back on its feet and nearing a surplus a just a few years just as it was in the past three decades.
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : federal budget, federal deficit, federal spending, obama administration, tax cuts Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Remember when the Democrats pretended to be worried about $1 trillion in debt?
Remember when the Democrats pretended to be worried about the paltry deficits of the Bush era?
Too bad, because deficits are so yesterday! Today's Democrat knows that deficits don't matter. After all, if someone like Paul Krugman, who used to rant and rave about Bush's deficits bringing about disaster, is not worried about Obama's significantly higher deficits (six times as much!) then why should we worry? (And Obama isn't even through spending for this year.)
Have I mentioned lately how good it is to be deeply into gold at this point?
 Current Mood : amused  Tags : democrats, federal deficit, hypocrisy, obama administration, paul krugman Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |


 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Asking federal workers to do what he refuses to do (find ways to cut federal spending) Obama's administration is still claiming the $1.3 trillion deficit for fiscal year 2009 is "not theirs", despite the Democrat controlled Congress delaying the fiscal year 2009 budget bills until after Obama was elected so he could have the "benefit" of a larger Democrat majority.
The $410 billion bill includes significant increases in food aid for the poor, energy research and other programs. It was supposed to have been completed last fall, but Democrats opted against election-year battles with Republicans and former President George W. Bush. (Truth should be told, too, that the deficit is closer to two trillion dollars.)
I'm sure they'll also claim that Obama only has to reach deficits of $650 billion to "cut the deficit in half", as if the massive stimulus spending somehow equates to routine spending planned and implemented by President Bush instead of being the Democrat response to a recession.
The fact remains that the massive spending bills have all originated in the Democrat Congress and Obama fully supported all of them and signed the bills with the most massive deficit spending since WWII. The deficits and their lasting damage to the American economy are squarely in his camp.
But the bill ran into an unexpected political hailstorm in Congress after Obama's spending-heavy economic stimulus bill and his 2010 budget plan, which forecast a $1.8 trillion deficit for the current budget year. Just a reminder: President Bush's last fiscal year deficit in 2008 was $410 billion dollars which itself was a step up from the fiscal year 2007 budget deficit of only $162 billion dollars. If Obama's last two deficits were to be that small you can be they would be claiming another economic "miracle" had occurred. Bush's planned fiscal year 2009 deficit was only $407 billion and both fy 2008 and fy 2009 contained massive increases in spending passed by the Democrat controlled Congress.
So much for the Democrats being the "party of fiscal responsibility", eh?
No wonder Obama has to beg federal employees to help him cut spending.
 Current Mood : relaxed  Tags : federal budget, federal deficit, federal spending, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
That pretty much sums up the Obama economic program in a word.
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama's budget would generate unsustainably large deficits averaging almost $1 trillion a year over the next decade, according to new estimates released Friday.
The new Congressional Budget Office figures predict Obama's budget will produce $9.3 trillion worth of red ink over 2010-2019. That's $2.3 trillion worse than the administration predicted in its budget just last month. Remember when Democrats (and their allies in the MSM) were falsely labeling the Bush deficits as "record deficits"? Remember when a deficit of $162 billion and 1.2% of GDP in 2007 was something to be concerned about? Remember when deficits of about 2% of GDP were cited as a reason to elect Democrats instead?
Now Obama is declaring that budget deficits of at least five times that amount in dollars and ten times that amount as a percent of GDP are "a new era of 'responsibility'".
Suckers!
I have one question for everyone who fell for that and who voted for Obama: how's that working out for you?
 Current Mood : vindicated  Tags : economy, federal budget, federal deficit, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
An interesting article by Ken Blackwell (the man who should have been RNC Chairman and who will hopefully be the next Senator from Ohio).
Barack Obama allegedly intends to be a transformational president like Ronald Reagan. But now President Obama is raising taxes on businesses and retirees, socializing the largest sectors of America’s economy, and decimating state sovereignty and creativity. This is the polar opposite of what President Reagan did in the 1980s, and reveals Barack Obama as the Anti-Reagan. Ironically the same people who called Reagan's mediocre deficits "the worst evah" are attempting to label Obama's, the first of which is twice as large as Reagan's worst, as "responsible spending".
 Current Mood : determined  Tags : barack obama, federal budget, federal deficit, federal spending, ronald w. reagan Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |


 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
That is, in effect, what the Obama stimulus bill is doing to American families.
A family of four is shouldering $200 worth of debt from this bill while only receiving $26 in return. And that assumes two taxpayers in the family.
Each and every week.
You know what's even worse? Next year it will slip to $16 a week.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to determine that $200 worth of debt is not going to be repaid at the rate of $26 (or even worse, $16). And that negative equity is going to continue to build each and every week for at least the next two years. Whatever the hopes for a "trickle up" economy are, they can't be one of reducing America's debt.
It will get even worse if the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire in 2010.
There are, of course, net beneficiaries to Obama's policies: labor unions, politically connected activist groups, people who don't pay taxes, politically connected industries, science projects currently in vogue, etc. The result is one of the largest transfers of wealth from tax-producing entities to tax-consuming entities in history.
America has been saddled with a sad legacy and an enormous burden. In one fell swoop Obama has doubled the federal deficit and will likely add more to the federal debt in his first term than President Bush did in his entire eight years in office.
So much for the "fiscally responsible" Democrats. I didn't think it was possible, but they've made Republicans look respectable again when it comes to being fiscally prudent.
 Current Mood : working  Tags : federal deficit, federal spending, obama administration Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Democrats continue to show their true colors when it comes to deficit spending.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Democratic-controlled Congress on Thursday approved more money for education, job training and health care than the amount sought by President George W. Bush, challenging him to veto a bill that funds popular domestic programs.
By a vote of 274-141, the House of Representatives passed the bill, which now goes to the White House for an anticipated veto. The Senate approved the bill on Wednesday.
The $150.7 billion bill exceeds Bush's February request by about $10 billion and is at the heart of a budget fight between Democrats and Republicans over spending priorities. Once again their claims to be concerned about deficits when they are not in power are proven to be lies.
And, of course, trying to balance the budget is portrayed as being "against the poor" (as if federal spending was the cure for poverty).
 Current Mood : busy  Tags : bush administration, democrats, federal deficit, federal spending Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Seriously, I do.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Federal revenue collections hit an all-time high in April, contributing to a further improvement in the budget deficit for the year.
Releasing its monthly budget report, the Treasury Department said Thursday that through the first seven months of this budget year, the deficit totals $80.8 billion, significantly below the $184.1 billion imbalance run up during the first seven months of the 2006 budget year. Gosh...deficit running at only 44% of what it was last year, revenues not just up but at record levels...whatever will we do?
Certainly not increase tax rates as the Democrats suggest, that is for sure!
 Current Mood : busy  Tags : bush administration, federal deficit, federal revenues Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
So close, yet so very far away when it comes to balancing the federal budget. We are only at about 1-1.5% of GDP as far as the federal deficit is concerned (despite what scare stories you may hear in the MSM and from Democratics (sic)).
Yet at this stage no one seems willing to do that last little bit of hard work to actually balance the budget.
Are 536 politicians really trying to convince me that in a budget of almost three trillion dollars they can't find $200 billion in spending to cancel or defer?
You know, if you would just freeze spending at 2006 levels (what the Republicans effectively did when they didn't pass new spending bills last year) the budget would balance itself because of rising tax revenues.
But no, there are always new special interest groups priorities, even from a Congress that promised to be "different" if they were elected.
Is their 100 hours up yet? Current Mood : cynical  Tags : bush administration, congress, federal budget, federal deficit, federal spending Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Remember when $200 billion was "good enough"?
WASHINGTON (AP) - Budget estimates released Wednesday showed some improvement in the deficit but gave little solace to Democrats struggling to match President Bush's promise to balance the budget.
The new forecast from the Congressional Budget Office put the deficit for the current budget year reaching about $200 billion after factoring in Iraq war costs. Last year's deficit was $248 billion. Of course I expect this Congress to screw things up by killing the tax cuts and/or raising taxes elsewhere and trigger a recession, thus reducing revenues and increasing costs. Current Mood : happy  Tags : federal budget, federal deficit, federal spending Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
The federal budget deficit continues to shrink in the face of gushing tax revenues.
WASHINGTON (AP) - The federal budget deficit estimate for the fiscal year just completed has dropped to $250 billion, congressional estimators said Friday, as the economy continued to fuel impressive tax revenues.
The Congressional Budget Office's latest estimate is $10 billion below CBO predictions issued in August and well below a July White House prediction of $296 billion. I blame the tax cuts.
At $250 billion the deficit is already near the half-way point in terms of reduction that President Bush declared was a goal still years away back in 2004 when the deficit reached $413 billion.
Compared to the size of the economy, the most valid yardstick for the size of the deficit, the deficit looks even smaller:
At 1.9 percent of gross domestic product, the 2006 deficit registers far below those seen in the 1980s and early 1990s. The modern record of 6 percent of GDP came in 1983 and deficits greater than 4 percent in 1991 and 1992 drove Congress to embark on a 1993 deficit-cutting drive. Tax revenues are up 12 percent from last year, fueled by strong revenues from corporate taxes. Revenues from payroll taxes are up 7 percent.
With unemployment dropping to 4.6% the economy looks as good as it did in the midst of the "miracle" economy of the Clinton years. Is it any wonder that Democrats are looking for something, anything else to run against in 2006? Current Mood : chipper  Tags : bush administration, economic policy, economy, federal deficit, unemployment Location : home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|
|
 |
 |

 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Democrats cried in their cereal after hearing this news this morning:
WASHINGTON — The federal deficit through July is running well below last year's pace, helped by strong growth in revenues, the Treasury Department reported Thursday.
Through the first 10 months of this budget year, the deficit totaled $239.7 billion, an improvement of 20.8 percent from the same period a year ago, when it was $302.8 billion.
The deficit in July totaled $33.2 billion, down sharply from an imbalance of $53.4 billion in July 2005.
The narrowing of the deficit this year reflects a surge in government revenues from higher corporate and individual tax receipts. Say it with me: Tax cuts work!
A little bit louder: Tax cuts work!
Louder! TAX CUTS WORK!
Say it again! TAX CUTS WORK!
Word! Current Mood : vindicated  Tags : federal deficit, federal revenues, tax cuts Location : Home
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |